*walks in* -0.4 seconds later- *immediately walks out* Posted over a year ago

Weird, I thought I posted a comment on that rumor post where there might be a chance of Alpha and Omega 9 happening, but it's removed? Or for some reason it didn't post. If anyone saw my comment there, I don't mind knowing. XD Posted over a year ago

Heads up folks, that "Press Release" has a lot of spelling issues. For example, "Alpha And Omega", "Tropical vacation", "BLU_RAY", (Is it normal for shift to be hold down for "-" when intentionally capitalizing the word "Blu-ray"?), "Into" in one part is capitalize in a title.

Either a person making this up isn't very good at grammar. Or it's real and the official writers are not good at grammar. XD Posted over a year ago

Disney made Copyright too long, Disney tried to prevent Winnie the Pooh grave, and recently Disney denies a final wish from a dying little kid to have a Disney character on their grave. It might be safe to say that Disney is officially the WORST popular company in the entire world. Posted over a year ago

E3 is almost here... Whoooo. >_> Posted over a year ago

Now in terms of critique, a legal art style is not flawed, but on a personal level when I saw Sonic's design in the movie it didn't look THAT bad, but the more I look at the face with the teeth, I am a bit more uncomfortable. XD Posted over a year ago

Weird, someone flagged a couple of my articles as "broken content". One of them was "Human Phrases May Be Realistic". Posted over a year ago

Honestly Alpha and Omega 1 should of been more magical, kinda like an average RPG where there is magic. Yeah I'm not kidding, I just think fantasy does nothing but embrace more possibilities and makes the wolves more likable.The idea of "realism" even if the wolves are anthropomorphic sounds predictable and boring. XD Believe it or not, even I wasn't a huge fan of the plot in the first movie mainly (not that I'm judging it on itself). Posted over a year ago

Imagine having your favorite legal TV show pulled because the person who made it has committed something serious, or was alleged to even though the art has nothing to do with it. Just imagine, good art censored/book burned because of some people not realizing the difference between art, and unrelated mistakes done by the same creator. - Following the Michael Jackson Simpsons episode incident. Posted over a year ago

Looking at some of the comments, I think maybe I can say that some people aren't acting better. We have one person personally attacking someone for a vore picture, and, well some other stuff. If you don't want this person acting like this, then honestly I ask some other people to do the same thing. It's hypocritical.
There I said it. -_- Posted over a year ago