It only seems fair since we don't see his personality in the original

^Exactly. We don't see anything really of his personality in the first movie so what we see in the sequels fill the gabs (forms most of it really).

What personality????







JK!!! In the sequels he gets one.

I don't judge on sequels. If I judged on sequels, I'd have a problem with some of my favourite characters from other movies.

Charming has no personality in the original!

I don't even consider the sequels.

I actually prefer him in the sequels but I NEVER judge on the Disney (not Pixar) sequels. I'm not one of these people that immediately say "sequels suck!" but all/most characters, to me, are different in their sequels. For example I really doubt Prince Charming would have this same personality (in the sequel) if Walt Disney was alive when it was made. He would probably have a completely different personality altogether, he'd barely be recognisable to that of 'Twist in Time'

Even though I DO like some Disney sequels, Cinderella III is one of the better ones, I don''t take them to heart too much. They're not "canon" to me.

I agree somewhat with Mongoose09. Basically, my general rule with sequels is to only recognize the new characters involved because the old characters often have seriously affected personalities.

^ That's the same with me. :) For example I love Angel from Scamp's Adventure and judge her based on that since she's not in any other movie - yet in the same movie I'm not a big fan of Lady&Tramp but it doesn't affect how much I love both of them in their original movies because, to me, that's who they really are.

It doesn't mean that original characters in sequels aren't great, because sometimes they are, I just don't judge them based on this.