|
bri-marie said:
I don't think there's a limit to ideas - whether the idea be about vampires, werewolves, royalty, or just plain normal people.
I can't speak for everyone, just myself, of course. But, for me, it's not the "new age vampires" that "drive me wild." It's the stories. It's the way they're written. It's the characters and situations. I can relate to Rose completely, and yet, at the same time, she is so other-worldly and mystical that I can't even touch her on the relatability. If Rachelle had written the same story, only instead of vampires, her characters had been werewolves, I'd still read it and love it just as much. I love Amelia At-Water Rhodes' shape-shifters, and Meg Cabbot's ghosts, and R.A. Salavator's elves. Not because they are shape-shifter, ghosts, and elves, but because the authors have made them human, given them human problems, and still kept the mystical aspects there.
The supernatural has always been popular. Zombies, wizards, vampires, werewolves, shape-shifters, angels, demons, god, ghosts, dragons, ectect. They've all had their "turn in the spotlight" so to speak. Now, it just happens to be vampires.
|
|