What really frustrated me was they didn't stick to the book! The ending was a fight with Luke. That was right, but the fight wasn't' the way it was meant to be. Actually the whole movie was off the plot. I think the director or the staff who made the movie hadn't even read the book. They probably just skimmed through and went "Yep, take the names, important bits". It was so frustrating. Thankfully they focused more on the book in The Sea of Monsters but even that movie bits were off the story-line. So what I want to say is "Please People Who Write The Titans Curse (next book, soon to be next movie) Actually Read The Book And Stick To It!"
posted over a year ago
The Percy Jackson movies have been sucking so for I do not think there going to get any better. They did the same thing with Eragon.
Actually, I think the Percy Jackson movies were good. They can't fit that much in a movie, they can't get a lot of great scenes and dialouge, they don't have any choice but to take those important bits and sections.
Although I agree that Eragon sucked. They didn't even try to take the important bits, the charcters were completly wrong, the atmosphere was tense and dark the ENTIRE MOVIE, overall terrible directing and writing.
I haven't read the books, but the movies are terrible! I'm sure you're right, otherwise it would not make sense that the books are as bad as the movies with so many fans
City of Angels had one of, if not the worst, movie endings ever!
I'd let them be happy and have a kid and grow old together, then kill her off after a long illness.
The Mist... i mean... they have the main character shoots everybody in the car (his son, a good friend, an elderly couple who had been helping them out) after they ran out of gas on the highway trying to get out of the Mist. so he, with four bullets in the gun, shoots everybody else to spare them from the "surely" miserable death they were going to get... but as he gets out of the car to let whatever creatures get to him first kill him, the army drives by and they're saving everybody... so if he had waited no more than 10 seconds... he and everybody else would have made it... i mean... WTF!! who thought that was a good ending... so he kills his only son, his wife is dead, the grocery store they left behind is full of lunatics... no... just no... that was a retarded way to end a movie...
i know frank wolf has nothing to do with twilight but damn i'd marry him xD oh and well i'd change twilight ending so that everyone dies...O.O im not a psycho
There are certain scenes I would like to change in some movies not just endings. I would've made twilight saga breaking dawn part 1 rated R or had an unrated version by adding more to the toned down scenes and it wouldn't end at the same predictable spot either
I would have to say Princess Mononoke. The ending was REALLY not what I expected! Princess Mononoke just goes back to the forest with her wolf parents instead of being with the guy. How dissapointing.
posted over a year ago
Oh and I would change by having the guy live with Princess Monoke and he becomes the prince of the beasts.
Usually if i see an adaptation of a book i like, i end up feeling this way, like with The Shining for example.
Also, Devil Inside had a horrible ending. Just when the film was reaching it's climax, boom! Car crash! It was like premature mess because they didn't know what to do next.
Also, the new Texas Chainsaw massacre remake. I thought the whole thing was terrible, but the cliche ending only cemented my distaste of it.
