Harry Potter Vs. Twilight
What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)
Harry Potter Vs. Twilight What books teach a better message? (explain why)
85 fans picked: |
|
harry potter
|
|||
|
twilight
|
|
Make your pick! | next poll >> |
this is my 1st time here by the way and im already a harry potter fan twilight hater
anyhow, harry potter teaches you to be brave and face your fears. it teachs you to protect the ones you love or care about. it also shows that love takes time to devlope. harry potter also shows that you shouldnt judge someone until you know what theyve bben through. (pretty much snapes story.)
what does twilight teach, you always need a man even if you dont even love him, relationships dont need to take time just jump right into them. get pregnet when your still a teen. let your abusive boyfriend save you every time. jump of cliffs after break ups.
which one do you think has a more positive message? i'll let you decide.
Twilight? Well, that apparently vampires sparkle, vampires can still get you pregnant even if their DEAD! Jump off a cliff when you think the "love" of your life dumps you. Destroy your life for the same reason. In a love triangle its okay to make to boys suffer for two whole books.Love is pure fluff and drama is kept to a minimum.Oh and its okay to get marry before you even go to collage.
Yeah Harry Potter def. :)
Twilight teaches you that dumping your friends and family for the hot guy, not going to college, and being in a controlling, abusive relationship is a good thing.
Twilight is just so unrealistic. "Of course its unrealistic, its about vampires and werewolves, stupid" some would say. I`m talking about the characters and setting.
In Twilight there are 3 groups of people. Bella and the Cullens, the Indians/werewolves, and the kids at Forks High.
At Hogwarts you`ve got your Gryffindors, Slytherins, Hufflepuffs and ravenclaws. Amongst that you have Quiditch players, Rich Brats, bullies, know-it-alls, poor kids, muggle borns, those who cant use magic (I forgot the English word, terribly sorry), Future death eater, the DA at one point, prefects, do I have to go on?
And that`s in Hogwarts only, the rets of the wizarding world is still out there!
Harry Potter is more realistic. Twilight shows that there are only 3 types of people and stereotypes them. No. You can`t pin people as this or that, a leson also covered in Harry Potter (I`m talking about Snape and Tom Riddle) because there is so much more to a person then meets the eye at first.
Also, death. Its sad, we probably all cried, were dumbfound or nearly cried when Fred, Lupin, Tonks, Dumbledore, Dobby or Sirius died. Its part of life. Sad, but still part of life. In Twilight we have the deaths of humans used to feed the vampires, Irena (is that her name?), Bree Tanner and a few other, not particularly important characters.The`"Big battle" , where Bella was sure she`d die, turned out as circle time. That was Twilight`s last chance to prove to me it was,about life. Circle time was the most disapointing end to a book I`ve ever read. People can`t go on thinking that death is avoidable, unlike Harry Potter were JK faces death and uses it to make the book interesting.
Forgive your enemies and people in general, because there is always a reason as to why they are where they are. And to always love. There's not enough love in the world. And to look aside prejudices.
Like you have Hufflepuffs, Gryffindors, Ravenclaws, and Slytherins who all have their strengths but alone, they can and will fall. It's not until they gain the school unity that they can really prevail. Examples: Most of Slytherin sided with Death Eaters, and therefore fell with them. Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Gryffindor, stood up against them and won. Harry would've never found the diadem(sp?) of Rowanna Ravenclaw if it wasn't for Luna. Malfoy was saved by Harry, Ron, and Hermione several times and that later helped Harry because Narcissa helped him live when he came back to life.
It shows what goes around comes around. And the Golden rule all in one. Especially that Malfoy example. The trio broke their cycle of hating Malfoy just so they could save his life.
There's more stuff. Making choices, love, death, living life, friends, etc.
Twilight: Showed me how important a boyfriend is in High School and how far jealousy will go and how everyone gets a perfect like in the perfect uiverse. I don't mean that to sound harsh. But it's true.
Anyways, books should teach values because impressionable readers learn from them. Several people look up to fictional characters as role models as well as real people.
When I write, my stories and poems don't usually have posetive messages. (as in I wouldn't recomend people aim for their lives to be as the lives I create) I would never stop writing just because some people are impressionable.
People should learn to live their lives as they see fit and not how stories direct them.
Well, not everyone is you.
Yes, but they need to look to people first to know HOW to live their lives, they can't just follow their instincts. They could just follow their parents or any other adult, but fictional characters are convenient.
And you say that people should not learn from stories? Well, what exactly SHOULD they learn from?
I believe people should learn from just observing, not being influenced. Not doing something or being a certain way, good or bad, because you read it in a book.
Actually, several of the fans read HP when they were about 6-7, and last I heard, Twilight was a 5-6 grade reading level. Even though a lot of the fans of both are teens, I personally think that people still need to learn morals, especially nowadays. And what better way to find good role models than in a book?
People do observe. They observe the behavior of the characters in books, and the result of their actions. If the result is generally good, then they can follow the characters' general paths and do the right thing.
For example, if a kid in a story stole something, he would get into trouble. That's how you learn. Adults can tell kids what to do and stuff like that, but the kid will never know what happens unless a. he/she experiences it for him/herself (which is good, but might involve risks) or b. he/she looks at what a potential role model would do, and observes the result. Fictional characters are examples of people in real life.
Sign In or join Fanpop to add your comment