Harry Potter Vs. Twilight Club
Join
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
Note: I originally had this as a question, but I guess it was too long, so I'm re-posting this in an article.

Question number one: Vampires hearts don't beat, correct? Correct. I believe this is mentioned several times. Now, in health class, they teach you that your heart pumps and makes your blood flow, correct? Correct. So, it stands to reason that, since vampires hearts don't beat, they don't have blood flow, correct? Yes. So, they have no blood flow, no circulation. They cannot bleed, or blush, or anything related to circulation, yes? Yes. This is said several times in the book.

Now, call me crazy, but don't chemicals and blood flow cause erections?

Most people know that erections are caused by the flow of blood into the three chambers of the penis. The corpora cavernosa are two columns of spongy tissue that make up 90 percent of the erectile tissue of the penis. The corpus spongiosum surround the urethra and holds only about 10 percent of the blood present in the penis during erection.
During arousal, the smooth muscles lining the veins of the arteries begin to relax. This relaxation causes blood to flow in. The veins of the penis begin to constrict; thus, blood can get in much more easily then it can out. The penis can hold 10 times the amount of blood when it is erect as opposed to when it is not erect. After orgasm, the veins and arteries return to normal and the blood flow returns to normal. Prostate cancer treatments can affect the flow of blood into the penis. Prostatectomy has been known to divert the flow of blood into the penis while radiation treatment has been known to cause arteriosclerosis, which is the hardening of the arteries.
link

So, Edward doesn't have circulation, no blood flow. He does not have a working heart to pump blood through his body, much less to his penis. So, how does he get an erection?

Question number two: Through the entire series, Smeyer/Bella put an emphasis on how cold Edward is. When they are laying together, Bella is wrapped up in a blanket, to keep her body warm while laying next to the frozen Edward, yes? In Eclipse, when they are in the tent, Jacob comes in and lays with Bella to keep her warm because Edward can't. Because he's so cold.

So, it stands to reason that all of Edward's body is an icicle, yes? So, since he can't lay with Bella on a couch with her clothes on because he's afraid she'll freeze, how do they manage to have sex? No, think about it! He's an icicle, frozen. His freezing cold, naked body is pressed against Bella's naked body. How does she not freeze?

Also, since his entire body is freezing, it stands to reason that his penis would be too. Even if he MAGICALLY managed to get an erection, it would be freezing cold. Wouldn't that be similar to sticking a Popsicle into her vagina? I can't imagine that would be too pleasurable, so, how does she stand it?

Question number three: Jasper has the scars from when he was turned into a vampire. Esme still has the left over pregnancy fat from when she was pregnant. This carried over with them when they are changed, yes? So why does Bella, who was torn open from the inside out, have no scars nor a gaping hole in her tummy?

Question number four: How does having too many chromosomes create super creatures?

Chromosomal abnormalities usually result from an error that occurs when an egg or sperm cell develops. It is not known why these errors occur. As far as we know, nothing that a parent does or doesn’t do before or during pregnancy can cause a chromosomal abnormality in his or her child.
Egg and sperm cells each contain 23 chromosomes. When they join together, they form a fertilized egg with 46 chromosomes. But sometimes something goes wrong before fertilization. An egg or sperm cell may divide incorrectly, resulting in an egg or sperm cell with too many or too few chromosomes.
When this cell with the wrong number of chromosomes joins with a normal egg or sperm cell, the resulting embryo has a chromosomal abnormality. A common type of chromosomal abnormality is called a trisomy. This means that an individual has three copies of a specific chromosome, instead of two. For example, individuals with Down syndrome generally have three copies of chromosome 21 (though a small number of cases are caused by chromosomal rearrangements).
In most cases, an embryo with the wrong number of chromosomes does not survive. In such cases, the pregnant woman has a miscarriage. This often happens very early in pregnancy, before a woman may realize she’s pregnant. More than 50 percent of first-trimester miscarriages are caused by chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo (1).
Other errors can occur before fertilization. These errors can alter the structure of one or more chromosomes. Individuals with structural chromosomal abnormalities usually have the normal number of chromosomes. However, small pieces of a chromosome (or chromosomes) may be deleted, duplicated, inverted, misplaced or exchanged with part of another chromosome. These structural rearrangements may have no effect on a person if all of the chromosome is there but just rearranged. In other cases, the rearrangements may result in pregnancy loss or birth defects.
Errors in cell division can occur soon after fertilization. This can result in mosaicism, a condition in which an individual has cells with different genetic makeups. For example, individuals with the mosaic form of Turner syndrome are missing an X chromosome in some, but not all, of their cells. Some individuals with chromosomal mosaicism may be mildly affected, but the severity of the condition depends largely on the percentage of abnormal cells.
link

According to every doctor ever, too many chromosomes create problems, not cool superpowers.

Note: I know it's fiction, and Smeyer can bend the laws of human health to fit her story, but I know a lot of babies who have chromosomal problems. To me, it seems like she's making light of these issues. There is nothing “extraordinary” about having a baby with too many chromosomes. It does not give them superpowers and this was something that was easily researched. Hell, she could have just used the phrase “magic” and no one would have thought twice.
added by RealSunshine
Source: LJ,tumblr,HP fans and Alessia @ FP
added by Brysis
added by goodtimes
added by goodtimes
added by KateKicksAss
Source: askadeatheater.tumblr.com
added by zanhar1
added by SnapeLovesLily
added by frankthe2nd
Source: tumblr
added by youknowit101
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
:D
added by narniafreak12
Source: motivatedphotos.com
added by crazychocolate
Logical reasons...
why Harry Potter v.s Twilight

*WARNING SPOILERS*

Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever...
continue reading...
Harry Potter beats Twilight. Of course. But I really don't like it when HP fans use opinion-ated "facts" when saying WHY Harry Potter is the better movie series. So, I, who am a major Potterhead, put together 7 true, solid, hard, and undeniable facts about certain aspects of the two movie series to prove why Harry Potter is the ultimate series.
**I will only be discussing the movies**

1) Soundtrack

Listen to this wonderful and memorable theme song. As you may have guessed, the theme song belogs to Harry Potter : link

Now listen to this: link
It's pretty, but it doesn't find a special place in...
continue reading...
posted by yemi_hikari
Everyone knows Rowling and Meyer's stance on fanfiction and the fact both writers have given a thumbs up of sorts. However, there is something I don't think either one of them would of approve of and it involves those Reading the Books a lot of people are supposedly writing. I say supposedly writing because copying from another persons work is not writing unless you are quoting under fair use. And boy... every single Reading the Books I've come across is not in fair use and constitutes plagiarism. I know how to write one that doesn't constitute plagiarism, but I'll save that until the end.

One...
continue reading...
posted by RonGetYourWand
As you can tell from my username, I am a huge Harry Potter fan. However, I wasn’t always. I used to be a Twihard (a twilight obsessed fan-girl). In fact I was one during the early stages of puberty, which is the age where most Twitards fall into the ‘romantic’ trap.

Here’s my story about how I went from ‘Twihard’ to ‘Indifferent’ to ‘Potterhead’:

I first read Twilight as a recommendation from a fellow member of the Teen Advisory Board of my library. I finished that book quickly and moved onto the next. The library didn’t have Eclipse so I read it ‘Twilight, New Moon, Breaking...
continue reading...
I don't want to hear about Harry Potter or any other book right now. I'm not setting this up for a debate about which is better. I just want to know seriously and honestly why you Twilight fans enjoy reading Twilight. I want to see an actual reason that Twilight is a good book.
If you don't like Twilight, I don't want to hear you saying anything bad about it. I just want to know why people like it. Because all the debate's I've seen have no actual reasons. They have HP fans and Twihards going on about which book is better, but not why they like it.
I do actually want respectful debate though. I want to discuss the reasons you give, but nicely.
If you can't be respectful of each other's opinions then just don't comment.
And I'm not trying to hate on Twilight, but if I disagree with you I will debate with you.
I don't know if there are other debate's about this, so I'm sorry if there are, but I didn't look.
I'm just rambling now so let's get onto it!
posted by SuperSnuffles13
I thought of a very wonderful quote. I'm not sure where it came from. I might have read it somewhere before. Maybe it is many quotes brought together. Maybe it is entirely of my own creation. I don't know. Anyways, I find it to be very beautiful and thought-provoking...

"Twilight is a children's book poorly disguised as great literature. Harry Potter is great literature poorly disguised as a children's book."

I doubt I wrote it. I'm not capable of coming up with something so witty and beautiful as that.

Allow me to explain what it means. It means that Twilight makes people think it is great literature...
continue reading...