Harry Potter Vs. Twilight Question
which do you believe is the bes film? with harry potter or twilight?
i prefer twilight...
|
_Angel_ posted over a year ago
|
|
next question »
|
|
Harry Potter Vs. Twilight Answers
|
mimifaith said:
Harry Potter is the better film. The actors are better, the scenery is stunningly better, the script and props are better and the special effects are better.
Even if i were a Twilight fan, i would still pick the Harry Potter movies, because i can understand how some people might think that the books are better, but the movie is actually crap.
No offence.
|
|
|
TeamSiriusBlack said:
Harry Potter.
-The actors can actually act and not stutter and blink all the time.
-The sets are amazing! I loved the Department of Mysteries tunnel and Chamber of Secrets.
-You get emotion from the movies. People say it was crap but it wasn't. I didn't read the books when I saw Order of the Phoenix and I actually cried when Sirius died. And I usually don't cry at movies. I didn't cry when Edward left. If more than anything, I was amused. A vampire leaving a human lover to protect her? It sounds familiar....
-The music is fantastic. It's not singing, it's classical. They writers use instruments and don't feel the need to add words because the sound itself says everything.
-You don't even need words to describe the feeling. In Prisoner of Azkaban, Harry was listening to the conversation Fudge was having with some of the teachers. You knew he felt angry at Sirius (R.I.P.) and that he was upset. I didn't even read the books and knew that was what he was feeling.
-I don't need to mention that any of the characters are hot to make it a reason like some Twilight fans do. Look at Sirius and Moody. Sirius isn't the handsomest person in the world but don't most people still like him? I do (hence my name). Look at Moody. He's one of my favorite characters because he looks before he leaps. He also tries to help Harry, like giving him the Order of the Phoenix picture, even if it doesn't help.
Twilight showed no depth to me. I just thought it was shallow and just lustful. Dumbledore's Army!
|
|
|
annoy_anonymous said:
Harry Potter and here's why. There is no excuse NONE whatsoever for such poor editing in today's films. I felt sorry for every twilight fan out there when I saw that horrible piece of garbage. I didn't think it was possible but it was worse then that the garbage called literature. The editing looked like it was done in a dorm room. The editors should be ashamed of themselves for using special effect you would generally see in a low budget 80's film. Acting was sub par at best. I just wanted to scoop my brains out with a hot ice cream scoop through out that horrible piece of work they call a blockbuster movie.
Harry Potter was no where near as good as the books. They also upset me but at least there are name actor/actress with experience (Gary Oldman, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman etc) editing that is suitable for todays standards.
And just to be a pain in the ass, Robert was with Harry Potter first In Goblet of Fire. That being said. If Harry is greater then Cedric and Cedric=Edward then Harry is greater then Edward:)
|
|
|
R3N3SM33 said:
I THINK TWILIGHT IS THE BETTER MOVIE CUZ WHEN WATCHING HARRY POTTER I FIND MYSELF LOSING THE POINT OF THE STORY. AND REALLY TWILIGHT HAS BETTER LOOKING ACTORS (ROBERT PATTINSON) THAN HARRY POTTER. AND I'VE NEVER REALLY LIKED HARRY POTTER EXCEPT FOR THE GOBLET OF FIRE.
|
|
|
andrealovesshia said:
HARRY POTTER!!! =D
i'm freaking sick of seeing Twilight everywhere !!
|
|
|
Makeupdiva said:
Sorry, Twilight fans but Twilight just can't compete with Harry Potter. Harry Potter is so much better.
|
|
|
KathyHalliwell said:
The Twilight movie wasn't good comparing to the book.I didn't like it very much.I hope the next will be better.
So,I prefer Harry Potter.
|
|
|
myfrau said:
i love both, but TWILIGHT is the best...<3
|
|
|
Little_Cullen said:
Harry Potter; it's more well made. I prefer the speed of the film, the camera work, the acting, all that.
But the Twilight Saga (book series) is still SOOOO much better than Harry Potter. I'd rather watch Twilight than Harry Potter, because it is sooo my favorite movie, but in truth Harry Potter is more skillfully done. Hope I'm not confusing you.
TWILIGHT RULES!
|
|
|
TEAM-EDWARDxxx said:
I love Twilight.. I think it was better the Harry Potter. but the harry potter movie's had more like computer work and it looked pretty kool.. But Twilight will always be better then Harry potter,that's just my opinion..
Edward,Emmett,Carlisle,Jasper = HOTT!!
Love the pic btw.. =)
|
|
|
forbiddenLURVE said:
I agree with KathyHalliwell!!!!
I hope New Moon will be good!!
|
|
|
Blossom71 said:
Ok harry potter was just thatok.Now twilight was damn awesome.
|
|
|
BookwormJD said:
Personally I pick Harry Potter besides Twilight movies because I think there were some good and make-you-squeal scenes that were cut from the Twilight movie but Twilight was a good movie though, Harry Potter has cool movies even if they cut some scenes that are important too. I mean with the effects and the animation is really amazing!
|
|
|
patrisha727 said:
I like twilight better than Harry Potter, but I say the Harry Potter films are better. :-)
|
|
|
veronicak said:
I say to this that I cannot choose....
the movies are both so different than the books (in a bad way) that it makes it impossible to chose....
(I'm not saying that I hate he movie's btw... I love them too much if anything..... I just don't belive in the changes that were made and.....
I should shut up now....)(All i'm saying is that all and everthing twilight and harry potter)
|
|
|
Mallory23 said:
Harry Potter is much better. The director did a really bad job with twilight.(I mean it's a great book, but the movie, in my opinion was average)
|
|
|
LilysLittleTwin said:
harry Potter. It's simple math: great effects+great story+awesome cast=fantastic movie. That was Harry Potter, for those of you that don't know. Now let's see Twilight: terrible effects+load o' crap story+butt-ugly cast=epic fail. Not lookig too good is it? Bring on the flames, they bring me joy.
|
|
|
dracos_cutie3 said:
Harry POtter is ten times better than twilight. (even if they butchered the 5th and 6th movie) actors in twilght aren't nearly as good as THe BA british actors in HP.
|
|
|
-ToujoursPur said:
Harry Potter.
Need I repeat the reasons again? You Twitards don't get enough of our amazingly accurate answers don't you?
|
|
|
ToyletGnome said:
Wow, which film was more successful, Twilight or Half-Blood Prince? Seeing as though HBP got much better reviews, was much better and made about $5.5 million more than Twilight, I'm going to go with Harry Potter.
|
|
|
YugiMuto said:
Harry Potter is my favourite.
|
|
|
Catbr said:
I almost slept watching New Moon, in the Preview(yes, I went. 00:00h). -Iamnotsureifitscalledpreview-
|
|
|
victoria7011 said:
Harry potter films way better...Dnt say twilight is cause its the worst film ever
|
|
|
franny_potter said:
HARRY POTTER! I'm sorry, but the twilight movie was HORRIBLE! The Harry Potter movies have amazing effects and all of the Harry Potters are out of this world! The twilight movie sucked, new moon= a bit better and eclipse= very good, but i still vote: HARRY POTTER!
|
|
|
bri-marie said:
Harry Potter, but only marginally. They didn't follow the books in HP and the editing in Twilight was crappy. The only reason Harry wins in my book was because the actors could actually ACT.
|
|
|
cullengirl1 said:
Twilight by far is the better movie. I do not need to explain. Harry Potter is just ANNOYING!!!
|
|
|
sid1123 said:
I am not here to upset anybody but this is what i think.......i like them both ..but i hate the fact that people keep comparing them ..the only similarity is that they are both famous.Otherwise there is no point of comparing sum1 like edward cullen to sum1 like harry potter and bella swan to hermoine granger ...i just dont see any point in it they are two totally different scripts and books one is a love story with the fictional vampires while the other is about skool and friends and magic i dont see any point in comparing them at all.......
|
|
|
tomfeltonfan44 said:
Harry Potter
I fell asleep while watching twilight
the fight scene is like for 3 minutes out of a two hour movie
|
|
|
helenacrazy said:
IM SOOOOOOOO OVER ALL THE TWILIGHT ROCKS AND EDWARDS SOOOOOO HOT BECAUSE ITS BULLSHIT
|
|
|
ladywyze said:
Twilight for me.
Harry potter is awesome, too.
But I prefer Twilight.
Don't ask me 'why'?
You know I won't come up with your VERY BRILLIANT explanation.
|
|
|
alisonfaith297 said:
HP. actually in term of book twilight is not bad too. but i cant really be fair cause i have not read the entire series of both. but twilight is so boring, in the first movie i fell asleep.in Hp there is more action
|
|
|
cleo7494 said:
Twilight is a great book. However, only the first film was "fascinating"! the others were..... a bit... you know! that's what i believe for the books too.. while hp movies get better and better! the same do the books!
|
|
|
always_draco said:
twilight is sooo stupid ..... it is just a wet dream of meyer....cant believe it is compared to HP......
its so pathetic....no logic at all.... not to mention bella's reaction in the whole movie is the same ,its like she has some constipation or piles problem..too much face touching ,horrible.....SCREW SPARKLING VAMPIRES ,LETS KILL VOLDEMORT !!!
|
|