|
russet-noon said:
I teach English Lit, and every time one of my students makes a bold statement like this one, "terribly written," I always ask them to support their argument with evidence.
What do you mean by that exactly? If it is because it's written in everyday English, I actually think that's wonderful, given the fact that they're books for young adults.
Based on my experience, the more accessible the language is in a novel, the better it is (with the exception of the very honorable Edgar Allan Poe, of course). Who wants to struggle while reading for fun, anyway??
Now, if you're referring to the story structure AND character development, I do acknowledge that you have a somewhat valid point there, but I wouldn't go as far as calling it terrible.
In Twilight, for instance, the antagonists (Victoria, Laurent and James) are brought in way too late into the story, and it's obvious that they're only introduced to create the final climax confrontation.
Also, something that really bothers me is that Jacob is used as an informational device and not much else when he first meets Bella. His character is poorly developed in Twilight, but this all changes in New Moon.
So, if these are the issues you're referring to when saying "terribly written," I partially agree, but, again, I wouldn't call it terrible.
I'd call it a lack of storytelling skills maybe, but keep in mind it's her first book series, so give the lady a break, why don't ya?
When you criticize a work so harshly, you better have some compelling and SPECIFIC evidence to back up your claims.
To sum it up, the story might be a bit cliche and predictable, but it's a PAGE TURNER, and the characters are very likable. They really stay with you.
In the end, no author's work is ever flawless. Heck, even Shakespeare had the problem plays, so my humble suggestion is only criticize something this harshly if you can prove you can do better. Let's see YOU write a 4-book saga better than Stephenie.
|
|