answer this question

The Hunger Games Question

Don't get me wrong,I love the Hunger Games just as much as the next person,but am I the only one who thinks that the movie wasn't all that great?

Please be honest,and another thing:if your going to answer this question please don't say anything rude.I'm just typing my mind here.
*
You are not alOne, but not on my side
cubsrule posted over a year ago
 Happy_Aura39 posted over a year ago
next question »

The Hunger Games Answers

PinkRabbit01 said:
Yeah... I liked the book better. The movie was great dont get me wrong but I felt it was so rushed. I guess they had a time limit but in the book you can savor and imangine each moment. These feelings tend to happen when any movie is based off a book you have already read....
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
thats all i'm saying,thank you
Happy_Aura39 posted over a year ago
darkling_menace said:
i didnt think the movie was all that great, really because of a problem with sound, during the reaping scene, it was just too quiet, this is a movie, have a violin or something playing in the background to add an effect. And During the beginning of the games when a lot of people were dying i would have liked to hear them dying or some kind of music to go with the massacre. Alot of the parts were too quiet for me, which does kinda give the feel of real life, but its a movie, and even when i was reading the book there was a soundtrack in my head
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
same here with the music in my head lol
Happy_Aura39 posted over a year ago
*
Aw, really :( ...I thought the music sorta added to the dread and intensity of the composition of such a scene...but I guess, if it's just me? xD
DarkCEpitome posted over a year ago
*
you dont know that, youre not a mind reader
darkling_menace posted over a year ago
LexisFaith said:
I thought is was great. They just left out important stuff. Like, Peeta now as a fake leg-they didn't do that, they didn't argue at the end to lead up to why peeta is so upset with her in the other books. and the governers daughter gave her the pin...she didn't buy it nor did she try to give it to prim.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Pumpkin_Pie said:
I really like the movie, But I found the cutting way too fast. It just flew from one scene to the next and I think if I hadn't read the books I would of found it really confusing.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yea, the camera moving around a lot is a common complaint about the movie
darkling_menace posted over a year ago
*
It kind of made me dizzy. :\
Pumpkin_Pie posted over a year ago
*
so agreed
jillian718 posted over a year ago
*
I think that's because they wanted to show the death, but didn't want to linger on the blood. So it could be rated PG-13
thetribute posted over a year ago
VictoriaLim520 said:
The movies was still awesome but yes i do have to agree. it wasn't as good as the book but maybe because we already read the book and that gave us spoilers to the movie
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
blazeandarose said:
lol, I havent even seen the movie yet. So I don't know. XD
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
stlouisfan said:
It was a good movie, but the shaking camera was annoying. Not to mention that the action moved WAY TOO FAST! But I enjoyed the actors acting skills and they got the charecter development down. Overall not great, but far from horrible.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
The books still better. Course I expected that.
stlouisfan posted over a year ago
jillian718 said:
i love the hunger games like crazy over it and have seen the movie 4 times i do agree they could have made the movie better they left out a lot of things that happend in the book but it was 2 hours and 22 mins long they had to stop it some where
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
nessie-eska said:
It was good but not great. I think the main problem was to present some events from Catniss's pov, eg when she was bitten by tracker jackers.
I think next movie will be better because of bigger budget.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
cparty721 said:
I think it was great but with some of the details it could have been better.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
lovingcookies9 said:
I agree with you! And now just like Twilight they have team Gale and team Peeta! I think it is getting really over rated and is going to be another Twilight! (I hate Twilight)! The books were great but The Hunger Games Trilogoy is getting really old!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Face_of_Music said:
NO... ur not alone. I liked the book better

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
cubsrule said:
Yep you are the only one because hunger games has about 3:30 hours if they did everything exactly like the book. So, they took some unimportant stuff out to make it two hours.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
mintymidget210 said:
Yes. I didn't really enjoy the movie. And knowing that people did like it really showed me how I don't like movies in general. It takes a lot for me to like a movie. And I can honestly say, I can almost hate The Hunger Games movie. ._.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Dancergurl1470 said:
I think the book was way better than the movie and so do a lot of my friends so no you're not the only person who thinks that :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
KPossible said:
It was o.k to watch, but not has great has i thought it would be... to tell you the truth, i don't know what to say...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
thetribute said:
I thought it was great! But movies are NEVER as good as the books.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yea,with books you can at least use you imagination.But then you find yourself pissed because the movie is NOTHING like what you expected.I learned that the hard way :-)
Happy_Aura39 posted over a year ago
*
I thought the movie was very simelar to how I imagined it, but the book no matter what is always more powerful then the movie :)
thetribute posted over a year ago
-AllTheTears- said:
Of Course book are always better than the movies
but i think the movie did the book enough justice. Yes, they did leave out some parts, but they weren't THAT important. The movie was far over 2 hours, they can't make it last forever. The acting was pleasing enough. I think that some parts were alittle too expressed. But overall, it was a decent movie, nothing i hate about it.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Agreed! Exactly what I was thinking in my comment.
thetribute posted over a year ago
seaprincess17 said:
I saw the movie first and i LOVED IT!!!!!!! the movie made me want to read the books and i LOVED them too! during the movie I was frequently confused by Katniss' lack of expression but after reading the books i think they played that perfectly. Of course i always want more details but the movie was very very good.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »