What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Fanpop Should users be aloud to post nude celebrity photoshoots (so long as they aren't vulgar)?

34 fans picked:
Sure why not
   47%
No! Never
   29%
Only if they are censored
   21%
I don't even mind vulgar ones
   3%
 zanhar1 posted over a year ago
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

14 comments

user photo
zanhar1 picked Sure why not:
Sorry if the images are offensive to anyone.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
vagos picked Sure why not:
i cant say no to that. XD
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
fanfly picked No! Never:
Tasteful nude photography is not offensive to me. But I doubt that the users on this site can handle it. There used to be a Nudity Spot- all tasteful, nothing pornographic- and it got deleted. :( Pretty sure someone reported it as offensive. The problem is that in American society nudity is automatically associated with sex.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
geocen picked Only if they are censored :
I mean, I don't want to see intimate parts of any celebrity over here
posted over a year ago.
last edited over a year ago
 
user photo
lucy32 picked Sure why not:
They are works of art. We wouldn't want to censor Venus statues, for example, would we?
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
zanhar1 picked Sure why not:
@fanfly Agreed. I'm fine with tasteful nude. It's rather disappointing that people are too immature for it and always sexualize it.

@lucy My point exactly. If it's done in good taste then I don't see an issue.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
boytoy_84 picked Only if they are censored :
As long that users don't post any graphic nudity with Female beast/private parts shown or Male private parts shown.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
LiptonGold picked No! Never:
Not on Fanpop, I don't think. I don't see anything wrong with nudity and/or sexual stuff but I feel like Fanpop's age range is centered a little too young for that as a widespread thing.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
michael said:
Personally, I don't have a problem with nudity, but we are trying our best to keep Fanpop free for our users and to do that we need to maintain certain standards set by our advertisers. Most advertisers either require their ads to run on sites that are nudity free. Fanpop is so large it's hard to find all the nudity so this is a difficult problem. Advertisers usually have no problem, but once in a while they find some nudity that we haven't found and then pull their advertising which creates a serious problem for us (both in current income as well as being able to sell future advertising space). So, regardless of how we personally feel about nudity, we can't really have it on Fanpop.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
fanfly picked No! Never:
^I was unaware of that aspect. Thank you for the information, michael. You've changed my perspective of the situation. Obviously, Fanpop comes first.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
zanhar1 picked Sure why not:
^^ It is indeed good to know. If it's Fanpop or no-censorship I'd have to choose Fanpop. I don't really care for censorship personally, but if it helps keep the site running more smoothly then it's cool by me. That info is definitely good to know.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
AnimeFan66 picked Only if they are censored :
Not meaning to sound ignorant, but I am not a fan of nudity. As long as it's censored it's fine to me. Again, not meaning to sound ignorant to those who like it.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
zanhar1 picked Sure why not:
Non-taken, nudity isn't for everyone. Honestly I'm not big on vulgar nudity. For me it depends how it's done.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
LowriLorenza89 picked Only if they are censored :
I guess it depends if you count discretely shot nudity (framed in a way that no sexualised body parts are visible) as nudity.
posted over a year ago.