answer this question

Twilight Series Question

Which was better? Twilight the book or the movie?

I say the book because, its slow and shows more communication with Edward and Bella. In the movie, they missed so many parts, so many chapters. Its like they rushed it.
*
The book. :)
mitchie19 posted over a year ago
*
no i think the movie
peace225 posted over a year ago
*
They also missed the stories which I was really anrgry about!
zanesaaomgfan posted over a year ago
 zanesaaomgfan posted over a year ago
next question »

Twilight Series Answers

VampiresRevenge said:
The books are definitely better. The movie was missing so many important moments that showed how and why Bella and Edward love each other. The book also lets you fall in love with characters based on their personality and not on their looks. The nice thing about books is that you get to feel like you are going through everything with the characters, while in the movies you only get to watch what is going on and you miss that connection.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Yes, I couldn't of put it into better words.
zanesaaomgfan posted over a year ago
*
Thanks. :)
VampiresRevenge posted over a year ago
*
Thanks, y'all. :)
VampiresRevenge posted over a year ago
sarah7789 said:
Books are always better than movies, there isn't any difference with this franchise. I liked the first movie, ok. New moon on the other hand i was very disappointed but hopefully Eclipse can be better, which by the previews i wanted to cry because i thought it looked really good. So, if its anything like the previews it will be good.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I thought that the director did a great job, the first movie was pretty bad compare how good the book was, the 2nd movie the director tried to put all the scenes in the movie. I think he did an excellent job compare to the first director.
Dayli posted over a year ago
taylorno1 said:
Book, of course!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
NCISLuverjk93 said:
Book definately. All books turned into movies are better because the movies always leave too much out :P
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
luvutoo said:
Definitely the book, you felt the love between Edward and Bella. Because of time limits in the movie, i didnt feel it as much. It just seemeed like a rushed relationship.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
allybean said:
movie




select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Why?
zanesaaomgfan posted over a year ago
ajhalecullen said:
The Book!! :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
italiangirl976 said:
Defiantly the books. The movies sucked. They were nothing compared to the books. Well the first one sucked, New Moon was better though.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
nikaitla said:
the movie because the book doesnt even have some parts in as the movie has
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ScottishChic said:
I say the books.
TWILIGHT the book is mainly speech which to me, is a downside but it's still a pretty good book.
However, the movie sucked. I mean, they missed out so much and they changed so much. Also, Kristen didn't do a good job in Twilight. She looked so plain all the time, it's like for cripes sake, smile or something! Robert done so much better.
So what I mean is, the chemistry and the feel of the movies depends on the actors/ actresses and if you don't like them, then the film is ruined for you.
The books go into things in more depth- cause they're the books but I know the movies need to cut things out and watch the budgets and all that but if they miss out important scenes, then it ruins the entire feel of the story- like The Half Blood Prince, they missed out Dumbledore's funeral which was a very important part in the book and a lot of fans were looking forward to it- see what I mean?
The books get more and more drama in them after each time and the chemistry doesn't depend upon actors who you could hate- or just think suck.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
i couldn't agree more...and you are right about dumbledor's funeral
shingkai posted over a year ago
*
I just asked about the actual movie. Not all of them.
zanesaaomgfan posted over a year ago
*
The actual movie- there is 2. Twilight and New Moon and I cut some out. Thanks Dayli!!
ScottishChic posted over a year ago
youngty24 said:
the movie
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
melcu said:
book book book book book book!!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
paxy said:
book for it's content, and movie because of the actors ;)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Bethyyyboo said:
The book is better! They missed out way to much in the film and also I dont think most of the actors suited the roles they were playing!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
shingkai said:
i always love the book
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
mrslautner12345 said:
I agree because they missed out on A LOT of love and passion in the movie
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
a lot of my friend that didnt read the book but saw the movie asked me why i told them that this story was supposed to be like a Romeo & Juliet story bc they said that the movie did not portray that love and passion that i was telling them that the book was about and i have to agree with them the movie did not capture at all the passion and love from the book'
Dayli posted over a year ago
pompeybabe said:
OMG I cant choose!! But..probably the book. xx
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
LifesGoodx3 said:
There's no competition, the books. Twilight was too rushed and they cut out my favorite scene (The blood-typing). New Moon though, was actually pretty good. The book was still overall better, though.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I know! when i first saw Twilight i asked the same question about the "blood typing" scene
Dayli posted over a year ago
Teamdamon33 said:
The book for sure!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
cutiegirl01 said:
The book because the movie doesn't have some of the better parts like in the restrant.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Dayli said:
The book, there is no way that i movie is going to capture all the emotions that were in that book. Plus the director left out a LOT of scenes from the book.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
zomeister said:
The books :)
You have all the details and in movies, they some times take important scenes out
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »