i would pick no one, but if i have to, it would be Esme, she doesn't play a big role in it and i want to see carlisle single and just for me alone ;-) :D LOL
Rosalie because she detests being a vampire more than anyone out of the Cullens. But...without Rosalie, we wouldn't have Renesmee (if you think about it).
um, well i dont think i wouldnt want any of them gone because they all are of some use throughout the book, and for the people that said esme....i love esme, shes the mother of the family and though shes not in the book that much edward and the rest of the family respect her and love her, if she wasnt there then edward wouldnt do some of the things he does because he always thought about what it would do to esme, plus who would carlisle be with? he needs his soul mate too....so i say none of them...sorry.
These are the reasons you CAN'T take out these Cullens from Twilight Saga
Edward- obvious reason...main character
Bella- same as above, although people dislike her she is essential to the saga..without her it would be nonexistant
Carlisle- he created the Cullens, he was the beginning to it all
Esme- without Esme the Cullens wouldn't be as close as they are, they would be a coven instead of a family and covens are easily destroyed, because their bonds are made by convinancy rather than love, and Esme makes it an act of love.
Alice- without Alice, James would have killed Bella and there would be no saga at all
Jasper- in Eclipse, his knowledge of new borns saves them all from that being the last book (haha)
Rosalie- If it wasnt for her(although I wasn't a big fan of her at first), we wouldn't have the adorable Renesmee in Breaking Dawn!
And that leaves Emmett. He doesn't play a huge role in the saga, but I would cry at the removal of Emmett. He makes the books so much funnier, always teasing Bella and in Breaking Dawn those innuendos thrown while Charlie was around were hilarious!
It is impossible to remove a Cullen without affecting the whole saga!