Possibly innocent. There's still many unanswered questions, like namely the fingerprint in blood that belonged to nobody in the family, that was left on the coffee table. How did a bloody sock get in an alley? If we're to believe Darlie did it, why wasn't there any blood trail leading to it? And why take a sock if she were planting evidence? Why not plant the knife there instead? And there's also the matter of the husband trying to arrange a break in as part of an insurance scam. I'm not convinced of either her innocence or guilt.

I'm not that familiar with the case so I'm not sure but as for the graveyard incident (which I'm sketchy about) look, people do odd things sometimes in their grief, it's how they cope. You can't convict someone over that. I am aware that her defense has asked for DNA testing and I say do it. Maybe that'll be the answer. But I just don't know, tbh?