answer this question

The Beatles Question

Do you think that Ringo and George should have sung more?

 thrillergirl18 posted over a year ago
next question »

The Beatles Answers

Anneka1010 said:
no coz otherwise they wouldnt be as good at playing there instrument coz they'd be too focused on singing
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
U have a point. I think they were the best at playing instruments. :)
rainandbomba posted over a year ago
*
thanks mate u r a legend :)
Anneka1010 posted over a year ago
*
Singing half the Beatles' songs didn't stop John or Paul's ability to play their instruments
Rubyrings posted over a year ago
tkp353 said:
George had a tremendous backlog of music that he basically put into his first solo post-Beatles, which was a TRIPLE album. Some of his best music, in my opinion, were on this album. However, like Paul, his music missed John's middle eight bars, which distinguished many Beatle hits.

But, to answer the question...YES, George could have and should have sung more than the ONE song he was allowed per Beatle album.

NO, Ringo sang just enough on the songs that were written for him. Need proof? Check out the writers, backup artists and vocals on the three songs he put out after the Beatles breakup and you'll get the point.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Rubyrings said:
Well, yes, I do. But I know John and Paul did their best to make sure George and Ringo got to sing some songs. And when you consider how many bands just have one lead singer and no one else sings anything....
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »