This is a spoiler. if u have not seen heroes vs villains finale, do not go 4 the question. it is in the background information section.

Well, I wanted Russell, but I agree. I feel like Sandra just sad around and fought with people...

I also wanted Russell to win and absolutely yes!!! You would think the jury would vote based on who played better. Sandra said it was strategy how she played, but she just can't admit she's slow and weak. If you played a highlight reel of the final three's game since the beginning, Sandra's would be the shortest by far. It's only because of the whole social aspect of the game why she won. Nobody bases their vote on who plays the best anymore. It's more about who they like. I thought the jury would have been more mature about who they wanted to be the winner (but I also can see how Russell made unnecessary comments that were just dumb to say). It's sad to see another slacker win again after seeing Natalie win Samoa. So stupid and yeah Parvati deserved to win it more than Sandra. It's disgusting that us; the fans have to call Sandra the first-ever two-time Survivor winner. PS. Did the contestants not learn anything from All-Stars. None of the previous winners should have even made it to the merge...man; needed to get that frustration out lol