What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Movies Anyone else find it ridiculous that Elizabeth Taylor was considered gorgeous and Judy Garland wasn't even considered pretty?

26 fans picked:
Yes
   77%
No
   23%
 hatelarxene posted over a year ago
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

4 comments

user photo
SherlockStark picked Yes:
Honestly, I don't really put much into what other people think on beauty; I mean, it's in the eye of the beholder right? And we are all entitled to our own opinions of beauty. That being said, I think Judy was really pretty. :)
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
KataraLover picked Yes:
Elizabeth Taylor wasn't even that pretty, she was plainly pretty at the most and kind of creepy looking. She was only considered beautiful because of her striking color combination. Her face is super plain, basic, and average. She only looks beautiful because they always have her dolled up, her mother had her dolled up and wearing make-up when she was a little girl and was forcing her into show business so people would think she was a gorgeous child, which worked. Luckily for her she had black hair, fair skin, sapphire eyes, and a mother that would doll her up because if she didn't she wouldn't have a career because people only hired her because of her looks, not her talent, take away all that make-up and her striking color combination and she'd just look like your average common plain Jane girl you see walking down the street. She wasn't even addicted to drugs that long for them to ruin her looks and yet she became ugly when she got older.

Judy was always absolutely GORGEOUS, until the drugs ruined her looks. She wasn't considered pretty because she wasn't tall or thin. They called her fat and nicknamed her hunchback, they must be blind! She was absolutely GORGEOUS! She had a natural beauty, she lost weight and did get prettier but not because of her weight, it's because her face got more mature and refined. She was absolutely GORGEOUS and deserved to be considered that and to know that she was one of the most gorgeous women that ever lived. But unlike Elizabeth she was hired because of her amazing talent. Plus she was not only beautiful on the outside but beautiful on the inside, unlike Elizabeth.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
hatelarxene picked Yes:
^Finally, someone else who recognizes that Elizabeth Taylor got hired because of her looks.

It's completely ridiculous. Judy was by far more beautiful than Elizabeth Taylor. More talented and a far better person, too.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
babe1492 picked No:
I don't get all the Elizabeth Taylor hate here at late.
posted over a year ago.