All who Died in Harry Potter(Most of Them Anyway)
Cedric Diggory, Professor Quirrell
Dobby, The Basalisk
Bilius Weasley, Barty Crouch Sr.
Igor Karkaroff, Aragog
Tonks, Bloody Baron
Professor Lupin, Helena Ravenclaw
Mad Eye Moody, Helga Hufflepuff
Bellatrix, Godric Gryffindor
Voldemort, Salzar Slytherin
Fred Weasley, Regulus Black
James Potter, Rufus Scrimigeour
Lily Potter, Gregorovitch
Severus Snape, Grindlewald
Ollivander, Vincent Crabbe
Albus Dumbledore, Lavender Brown
Sirius Black, Colin Creevey
Peter Petigrew , Nagini
Octavius Pepper
Charity Burbage
Bathilda Bagshot
Hedwig
Cedric Diggory, Professor Quirrell
Dobby, The Basalisk
Bilius Weasley, Barty Crouch Sr.
Igor Karkaroff, Aragog
Tonks, Bloody Baron
Professor Lupin, Helena Ravenclaw
Mad Eye Moody, Helga Hufflepuff
Bellatrix, Godric Gryffindor
Voldemort, Salzar Slytherin
Fred Weasley, Regulus Black
James Potter, Rufus Scrimigeour
Lily Potter, Gregorovitch
Severus Snape, Grindlewald
Ollivander, Vincent Crabbe
Albus Dumbledore, Lavender Brown
Sirius Black, Colin Creevey
Peter Petigrew , Nagini
Octavius Pepper
Charity Burbage
Bathilda Bagshot
Hedwig
I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true or if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured by magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured by magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
