How come the fact that the vampires sparkle is annoying everyone?

it doesnt bother me in the least.I happen to love Twilight and i am a Twi-Hard and proud of it.I wear it like a badge of honor.I happen to love sparkly vampires,especially if their name is Cullen,especially Edward.Yes,I am also a Team Edward fan and am even more proud to be a member of that club too.If you think I am a teenage girl you are wrong,because Twilight isn't just for teenage girls.That isn't Edward's sparkly skin you see in the sunlight,that is his soul that you see and if you ask me that just makes him all the more beautiful.His inner beauty coupled with his outer beauty truly makes him sparkle.

It doesn't really matter whether he sparkles or not.Its what's inside that really counts.99 % of all Team Edward girls were drawn to Edward because of his charm,sensitivity,and chivalry.He was very old-fashioned and gentle-man-like.Something that you don't really see much today.

Well I on one hand don't find anything really bad about it since Edward to me is just a negative character who I never really liked.
On to the question i think others hated it because vampires used to be known as fierce blood sucking murders who were sensual and just bad ass i.e vampires like in Angel, or Buffy the vampire Slayer, aand the anne rice vamps and a lot of fans of the classic vampire genre where insulted that she kinda degraded the awesomness of the vampire and instead of making them combust into flames in the sun she made them glitter which according to some opinions i have seen makes people see the vampires as pansies and just lame due to the fact the sparkle.
I think a lot of classic vampire fans were just insulted at what meyer turned the vampire genre into.

I just can't take the sparkles seriously. It reminds me of the Rainbow Magic books I used to read when I was a kid.

I might've actually liked twilight somewhat if the vampires didn't sparkle like giant fairy boys.

Well, think about it. Before Twilight, vampires are supposed to be like half bat and half person, right? So, whenever people think about them going out into the sunlight, they would think they'd burn. Sparkling bodies is usually how to describe a fairy. Of course that's going to annoy people. I mean, a sparkling vampire? Wow, that would sound unrealistic with the fact that vampires are just supposed to burn in the sun instead of sparkling. Like, didn't you think the same thing would happen before Twilight came out? I don't know if this answers your question but hopefully it will.

Meyers basically ruined vampires in a sense. Vampires are supposed to be turned to ash when they step out in the sunlight. Fairies normally are the ones who sparkle and then theres the fact that Meyers makes her vampires hard to kill. Then there is how she makes them from blood-sucking murderers to...basically what Edward Cullen is. A human loving,stalkerish,sparkly vampire who should have been a fairy instead.

It's because it makes it even more different to the classical vampire image; it literally means vampires don't have a physical weakness. After all, if they're seen sparkling, they can just kill the humans who saw and move to a different place or country. Although it's good to be original, a lot of people (including myself) feel that twilight vampires aren't vampires. They don't burn in the sun, they don't not like holy water or Bibles, they don't seem to be allergic to silver (at least it isn't mentioned in the series, I think; I admit I didn't exactly reread Twilight), and they can't be killed with a stake through the heart. Their only weakness is sparkling, which isn't vampire-like, making them hardly vampires at all, and isn't really a weakness at all.

As well as making vampires annoying Gary-Stuish, it's seen as very shallow: as in, oh, of course even vamps supposed weakness makes them handsome and beautiful. Please don't attack me for saying this, you asked why people hate sparkling, and I answered. It's not a weakness, shallow, and kind of lame.

Oh, and it's seen as gay for boys to sparkle. I don't like that argument, but lots of people think that.

There is sense in why vampires burn in sun:
It's becoz they are unholy creature and they cheat natural process of human life so nature found a way to go against them
The logic Meyer came with her sparkling vampires was very stupid:
She said that they have diamond like reflective cells in their body that reflect (sparkle) when they come under direct sunlight but a reflective surface will reflect in whatever light it comes under and it need not be sunlight only so there is actually no logic in what Meyer said.
Vampires are negative characters and though now they seem to have become heroes of many major supernatural fiction peple still prefer them in anti-hero role than being all sugary sweet and human

it doesn't bother me in the least,infact it makes them even more extraordinary