What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Debate Do you agree with the statement: "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." ?

34 fans picked:
Yes
   56%
No
   44%
 NightFrog posted over a year ago
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

10 comments

user photo
ThePrincesTale picked No:
Guns are literally implements meant to kill. To argue that they don't murder is nonsensical. That their prime function is to kill sets them apart from most other commonly-used weapons, as well as their efficiency and ease to do so.

Less guns around = reduced capacity for a murderer to kill= less likely someone's going to die. Pretty simple.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
whiteflame55 picked No:
It's not really a reasonable statement. On a basic level, yes, an inanimate object isn't capable of killing by itself. What this implies, however, is that a human being is just as capable of killing people as a human being with a gun. A gun dramatically enhances the capability of that human to kill, therefore that gun participates in the killing. It's certainly an effective assistant.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
hetalianstella picked No:
It's always sounded like a pretty unclear argument to me.
Yeah, people kill people.
With guns.
Guns help a lot.
posted over a year ago.
last edited over a year ago
 
user photo
fanfly picked No:
It's an overly simplified view of a complex situation. A silly catchphrase meant to justify America's gun culture.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
cassie-1-2-3 picked Yes:
I only see it as if someone iss killed with a gun, it's a persons fault. Nobody can claim "it's not my fault, it's because I have a gun".
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
blackpanther666 picked No:
Completely agree with Whiteflame on this one. It's not a reasonable statement to make and doesn't do a good job of trying to 'justify' any form of gun culture, especially in America. A person without a gun is far less dangerous than a person without a gun, therefore, the gun contributes to the murder for the basic fact that it is a weapon and weapons are created with the intent of being used to cause serious harm. It just boggles my mind that people can say this with a serious face and believe it.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
alismouha picked No:
I feel like this is the sort of thing that's blindingly obvious to an outsider; but some are in denial because gun culture is so significant to U.S. society and history.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
zanhar1 picked Yes:
@Cassie My point exactly.

While yes guns are designed to kill they are designed for military purpose or recreation (like hunting) as far as I know. They were not designed to kill a man for the sake of killing a man or for vengeance kills. The gun didn't tell the man/woman holding it to shoot up an innocent person. The gun's holder made the decision on his/her own. If a person wants to take the life of another he/she won't stop just because there is no gun; really anything can be a weapon--if it isn't a gun then it's a knife. Hell, some choose to hit victims with their car or start large fire's in the house of the target. Point is if a person really wants another dead than he/she won't stop because guns aren't around, he/she will find another way to follow through. Which leads right back to my other point; it's all about motivation. The gun didn't come to the user. The user picked up the gun. Because he/she wanted to use it.

However I can agree that a gun certainly make it easier to kill some one.

I can also agree that in the case of an accidental firing that it is the gun's fault as the person didn't mean to fire it off. I don't know much about guns, so I don't know how one can accidentally pull the trigger but no less. Or if the person was aiming for, say, a deer and they hit a man.
Of course it can be argued that the person's irresponsibility and lack of gun knowledge is what caused it which proves the stated statement.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
ThePrincesTale picked No:
Knives and chairs are not for the express purpose of killing/maiming people, they are tools for food preparation and sitting down. Guns are tools for killing. Specifically, they are tools for killing efficiently, from a distance and with relative detachment. They have been optimised for that purpose. When another tool is used to kill, it is being misused. When a gun is used to kill, it is fulfilling its sole function. There is a massive difference.

This phrase is literally the stupidest and emptiest argument against gun control possible.

To use an extreme example, is the same logic applicable to a WMD? "Nukes don’t kill people, people do". Humans are responsible for making the decision about whether or not to use a WMD, after all. Let's unregulate WMDs. They don't kill people, it's the people that press the button that kill people.

One more thing: the US is responsible for for 80% of all firearm deaths, 86% of all female firearm deaths, and 87% of all child firearm deaths link. Logic like this just means nothing will ever be done about it. It's honestly so sad.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
I'm not totally against guns, but... people kill other people WITH guns more than any other weapon, I'm pretty sure.
posted over a year ago.