Debate Club
Join
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
I found this in my notes for my English class... I figured I'd share them with you here.

In Classical times, heterosexuality, or the love of a man for a woman, was considered to be "an animalistic urge to be slaked quickly only for the purpose of reproduction" (Henry Staten, English 202 instructor) while "platonic love" or the love of a man for another man, was considered idealistic and "above the beasts."

Such close friends were in fact called "lovers," like Hercules and Hylas. To fall in love with a man was the "proper" thing to do at the time, and signified a wonderous thing.

This "homosociality" as it has come to be known, is not exactly the same as homosexuality. Men touched, even kissed, but were not necessarily sexual with one another, or at least they didn't consider it to be sex. They were at ease, would hold hands, and trusted men more than they trusted their female counterparts.

However, as the Renaissance rolled about, and women's status was elevated to that of muses and Goddesses (Dante's Beatrice and Petrarch's Laura), the love between a man and woman was no longer considered that of a bestial urge, but indeed on par with the love shared between men.

Even in the Renaissance, however, the line between heterosexuality and homosexuality was still blurred with the homosocial concept, and everyone became, in a sense, bisexuals. William Shakespeare, one of the world's most famous Renaissance poets, is infamous for his ambiguous sexuality, embodied particularly in sonnet # 20 ("A man in hue all hues in his controlling/Which steals men's eyes and women's souls amazeth... But since she pricked thee out for women's pleasure/Mine be thy love, and thy love's use their treasure"). Not to mention his blatant commentary on the ambiguity of sexuality in general in his plays "Twelfth Night" and "As You Like It."

As the Renaissance wound down, however, and we entered the Age of Enlightenment, Christianity regained its stance on the topic of homosexuality and it became one of the cardinal sins for a long time, up until the twentieth century. The homosocial culture of Classical Times and the Renaissance was dashed, and men became afraid of touching each other even in the most casual of ways. Where they would have comfortably held hands walking down a road, or kissed one's cheek as a thank you, they became isolated, and aggressive, for women were once again considered beneath them and untrustworthy, and they lost their platonic lovers, and thus became malcontented, and we lost much of the art and beauty produced by the Renaissance.

Even now, through Pride Parades and media representation, homosexuality is still considered by many to be "evil" or "sinful" based on certain passages of the Bible (specifically the book of Leviticus) or the Koran or other Holy Books and scriptures. My only purpose in writing this is basically to ask this question.

We consider many things from the Classical and Renaissance eras to be beautiful and intellectual achievements of man. Meanwhile, in modern times, we consider ourselves to be lazy and belligerent, defensive and close-minded. When there were no "rules" on who one could or couldn't love, and when no one was trying to infringe upon everyone else (politically, religiously, and artistically), mankind made some of his best achievements. Mankind was also sexually ambiguous. And now in a world full of labels and judgment, we consider it our responsibility to tell others when they're wrong according to our own values. Why do you think this is?

Mellow out, people. Lighten up, and stop being so judgmental. "Straight" people were once considered unusual and heterosexuality was considered to be "less than human."

So are we progressing or are we regressing?

I'll just sum it up.

Heterosexuality was once considered vulgar and necessary only for reproduction all the way through the Renaissance Era. "True love" was thought to exist between two people of the same sex, not between a man and a woman. It was only in the Age of Enlightenment when Christianity regained its foothold on Europe that homosexuality once again became a sin.

All I'm saying is, our perspectives change with the time. Why tell someone else that they're wrong based on your set of values?

"You should show courtesy and be cordial with each other, so that no one should consider himself superior to another, nor do him harm."
-The Prophet Muhammed

"Love Thy neighbor as you would yourself"
-Jesus

"Whatever you so wish that men would do to you, do so to them, for this is the law..."
-Matthew 7:12
added by alinazeer
Ex-White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan exposed Fox News as a propaganda tool for the White House on Chris Mathews Hardball.
video
fox news busted
exposed fox news
propaganda
white house
president bush
chris mathews hard ball
added by Cinders
Source: blisslikethis, the emmies
added by tamore
added by -sapherequeen-
Since I apparently appeared 'biased' in my previous video, and I thought that others may find these people's opinions interesting, here.
video
interviews
opinions
politics
political
debate
abortion
pro-choice
posted by x-Kissez-x
Okay, if you're a devout Catholic, and are determined to stay that way, look away now. I am an atheist. I believe nothing. But if I were to be anything, I would be a protestant. I say this because from where I am standing, the Roman Catholic church is a con. A way of making money and an attempt to take over the world. If you think about it, Catholics see it as though there are two types of people between them and "God" if that's is the correct term. Firstly, there are Preists. Is it right to think that because you have read the bible and you wear a robe, that you are closer to "God", and above...
continue reading...
added by tamore
Source: LIORA K PHOTOGRAPHY
added by KarbonKopy
Source: rightwingstuff.com
added by alismouha
added by Cinders
Source: http://www.stickershoppe.com
added by hetalianstella
added by SJF_Penguin2
added by tamore
Source: LIORA K PHOTOGRAPHY
added by Cinders
Source: Cinders, Fanpop
added by TheGamer007
Source: PalmBeachPost.com
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcelloSendos
After Cardi B launched a taxation tirade against Uncle Sam on Instagram, Remy took on the challenge of explaining what's happening with all her money.
video
debate
issues
tax
taxation
irs
uncle sam
usa
united states of america
unnecessary spending
cardi b
reason
remy
2018
added by tamore
added by dbz9000
video
politics
political
funny
humor
added by tamore