Debate Club
Join
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
ok, obviously that's not gerado, but still.
ok, obviously that's not gerado, but still.
WARNING- THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS SOME INFO WHICH SOME MAY FIND DISTURBING OR UPSETING.
85 percent of the time, I like to think the world's a wonderful place. we have tecnology and nature all rolled into one delicious sushi-package, we all have different place to visit and new things to learn. most of the time, the world's a very pleasent, innocent place to be. But 15 percent of the time, horrible things happen. people crash planes into buildings, tecnology is faulty, nature is being destroyed and the odd teenager sometimes drops a baby bomb on her parents and boyfriend. but only very ocassionally do i read or hear something and feel all these emotions at once-
- Degust.
- Shock.
- disbelief.
- and maybe just a little bit heartbroken.
I have only one word to discribe all those emotions coming together- HORRIFIED.
Now, before i explain the debate relevence, read the passage below from wikipedia about "Lina Medina". I watched a documentry about her and was so shocked i suspected i should probably look her up to check this wasn't some kind of fake-

"Little Lina lived with her father, mother and eight siblings in Antacancha, 450 kilometres east of Lima, the capital of Peru. The shamans in the village became concerned about her belly getting bigger and bigger and asked her father, Tiburcio's permission to perform an exorcism to get rid of "the snake under her belly". Permission was granted and the ritual was performed. However this did not have the desired effect and her parents started believing that she was gravely ill with a tumor growing in her stomach.

They then travelled the 70 kilometres to the town of Pisco to Dr Gerardo Lozada who took charge of Lina's preliminary tests. He immediately noticed the size of her stomach and also thought that it might be a tumor. However, after evaluating her clinical tests many times and with the scientific thoroughness required by the circumstances, he declared Lina to be 8 months pregnant. He immediately informed the police who in turn immediately arrested her father, as the prime suspect of having sired the baby. He was soon released though as no there was no evidence against him. One of Lina's siblings, a mentally disabled, 9 year old, brother was then suspected of fathering the baby but this also could not be proven.
As a young adult, she worked as a secretary for Dr Lozada, who saw to her being educated and who also helped her to put Gerardo through high school.
At the age of 33, Lina married Raul Jurado and spent her married life in "Chicago Chico", a very poor suburb of Lima. In 1972 she gave birth to another son. During the 80's her house was demolished to make way for a highway and she did not receive any compensation whatsoever.

After almost 70 years it is still a mistery as to who fathered Gerardo. Lina and her husband still lives in poverty and it was reported in the "El Pais" journal that she has only one ambition: to obtain compensation from her government for the house they demolished."

ok, i could probably follow up a hundred debate relevences to follow that passage, but i'll narrow it down to four:

Debate relevence one- Who impregnated Lina?
in the passage, it states there were two possible father- her nine year old brother and her father. So, a lot of questioning around this topic is- who impregnated her? it had to be someone, so who? the majority of people think it may have been her father--- who many suspected of doing sadistic abuse to his own daughter, seems the most likely. But then again, there is no history of Mr.Medina having any pyshcological or criminal records like that, and his friends and family discribed him as a honourable, kind hearted citizen who would never harm a fly. (PW's take on it- yeah right.) so, if that's true then the only possible father would have to be her older brother but--- how? at the age of nine, and in those times, it's likely you would be very uneducated about sex, adult relationships or anything of the sort and i find it unlikely that he was the father. what do you think?

D.R 2- If abortion existed at the time and it wasn't to late to have a abortion, should Lina of had one?
For me the answer is pretty simple and straightforward, it seems unfair that a child would have to be forced into adulthood before her sixth birthday. But apprantly according to quite a few blogs, even in the case of a five year old- abortion is never ok. for me, this sounds ridiculous, if not completely cruel, but i just wanted to ask wheather her pregnanacy should of been terminated if it was possible to everyone reading, just out of curiosity, and if you don't think abortion was exceptible even in the most extreme of cases- why? And even if you are pro-life would you make a exception in this case?

D.R 3- should Gerado of been adopted instead of living with his mother and grandparents?
Another issue faced with the pregnancy of Lina Medina, is, ok, should they of kept the baby Gerado living in the same house as his mother? True, he didn't actually know she was his mother, but after going through a pregnancy and ceasarian, was it fair that Lina couldn't forget about the horrible things that happened to her and move on? even at the age of five, she must of been embaressed, traumatized maybe even ashamed. And now, having a constant reminder of her mis-fortune everyday. On the other hand, some could argue it was the best dicision as it apprantly "educated ms.Medina and it could of been heart-breaking for all the family to see gerado go, and also to be abandoned due to someone else's mistakes."

D.R 4- Should Gerado of been told about his mother?
Ok, this is a harder one to form a opinion on. Should Gerado, at the age of ten, of been told that his big sister, is actually his mother. Now, one hand, no one would want to be told that. if you have a older sister, or brother, and your "parents" just broke it to you that actually, either your big sister gave birth to you or your brother is the reason for your existance, how would you feel? there was no actual need to tell him, why put someone with a happy life through a unessicary truth? it's almost like taking a normal life away from this 10 year old. But on the other hand, doesn't he have the right to know? he has just as much right to know about his true origin as we do our origins, so would it of been fair if he was robbed of that? this one's reasonably hard to get my head round.

So, that's four questions i'm asking anyone who's reading this and 1 shock i'm presenting one who's reading this. i'm interested to hear your opinions and well, thank you for reading.
-pandawinx.
Lina Medina, world's youngest mum, some believed it was a hoax, but itt is backed up by lots of medical evidence, so sorry folks, we can't comfort ourselves with that one.
Lina Medina, world's youngest mum, some believed it was a hoax, but itt is backed up by lots of medical evidence, so sorry folks, we can't comfort ourselves with that one.
The origin of life: During reading an interesting novel about Dawkins and his theories on evolution, I discovered this particular bit. Dawkins has no solution for how life actually evolved, or arose. Dawkins says: 'It is a complete mystery' (if you wish to know more, read chapter 13 of The Greatest Show On Earth: the Evidence for Evolution)

I would like to point out that I have not really found a viable explanation for the origin of life, yet. I suppose that people assume it was the Big Bang and the consequential events following after, which caused life to erupt in the form of micro-organisms....
continue reading...
John Oliver explains why the UK leaving the EU is a terrible idea, who's responsible for it, and everything it'll screw up. There's also a lovely little song at the end. Clip from Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, June 19, 2016.
video
politics
political
brexit
united kingdom
european union
last week tonight
john oliver
june 2016
posted by TDDD
I see the concept for Schrodinger's Rapist getting a lot of flack. People, when confronted with this idea, say things like "This is stupid. Not everyone is a rapist!" or "This is just feminist propaganda meant to instill paranoia in women and make them afraid of men."

I personally think that everyone who wants to abide by the theory has every right to do so. Let me give you an example:

About two years ago I was seventeen and during Halloween break I was working in my Mum's office. But there was one day when my Mum couldn't drive me home and I had to get the bus. This was all fine - I was perfectly...
continue reading...
This is ALL made up but conversation is possable and in some cases has happened*


A woman was walking down the street when she saw a man reading the bible.


Woman:Why are you reading that?

Man:*looks up* Because I'm Christian

Woman:Why are you Christian?

Man:*shrugs* Because God is the creator of all things.

Woman:*smirks* Oh really? Are you sure about that?

Man:*nods*

Woman:*sits next to him* What about bananas? They are made by people.

Man:They are?

Woman:*nods* And our words, are the words we speak to communicate to one another made by him?

Man:No, but when I ment created all things I ment...
continue reading...
On July 11th, Fox News' Kelly File featured a focus group to talk about the Dallas Shootings, Protests, Black Lives Matter, Obama, Race and more. This was in direct response to increasing tensions between the police and specifically the Black US population. If you know anything about me, you probably know how important I believe it is that people keep talking in a constructive manner in order to come to real solutions. This is why I do not like hypocrisy when it comes to tolerance. I just happen to believe in beating fire with water, not with more fire as I believe it only fuels it and makes...
continue reading...
added by amazondebs
Source: haildubyus
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcelloSendos
The Oklahoma ultrasound law she refers to has been legally challenged, but many others just like it are being passed in several states.
video
politics
transvaginal ultrasound
pro-choice
abortion
women's rights
rape victims support
added by MajorDork74
Source: RightWingStuff.com
note: i put the word arab in quotations when i say -israeli "arab", and "palestinian"- on purpose. you'll see why when you read your way to the last myth

Also tell me if you spot spelling and/or grammar errors in this


Myth 1:“The Jews have no claim to the land they call Israel.”

fact:When the jews were kicked out the holy land by the romans, the romans weren't able to kick all of them out. also some jews did return to their home sometime after the diaspora. when the muslim empire conquered the holy land, it wasn't jew-free. many of the jewish people there mixed in the conquering arabs. then...
continue reading...
We have a lot of problems in our world. Some issues are things that would be prevalent no matter what. But I firmly believe that the main cause of the majority of problems in our world is human closed mindedness. Think of how many issues we could avoid if we could just open our minds to other ideas, and think how much more advanced we could be. Here are a few examples of issues that could be avoided if we could open our minds to other ideas.

Racism
There are many people who hate a group of people just because their skin is a different colour than their own. But really, if you think about it,...
continue reading...
This article details the arguments supporting the position that "mechanical pencils are better than wooden pencils" in the link, in order to ensure that arguments are not repeated and also for the audience to keep track of the arguments and their counters. This article was last updated on 8 April 2008.

The arguments come in two forms: arguments for the superiority of mechanical pencils, and arguments for the inferiority of wooden pencils.

Mechanical Pencil Superiority

Argument: Less time, effort and equipment to keep mechanical pencils sharpened.

Argument: Mechanical pencils come with a clip to...
continue reading...
Native Americans call themselves many things. But one thing, they don't. On June 18, 2014, the US Patent Office canceled trademark registrations for the Washington Redskins.
video
debate
washington redskins
nfl
football team
us patent office
national congress of american indians
native americans
changethemascot.org
commercial
The nearsighted parrot who works at a bank just took down the frontrunner of the Republican party in less than twenty-five minutes. #makedonalddrumpfagain
video
donald trump
john oliver
last week tonight
make donald drumpf again
super tuesday
republican nominee
1.I'd really rather you didn't act like a sanctimonious holier-than-thou ass when describing my noodly goodness. If some people don't believe in me, that's okay. Really, I'm not that vain. Besides, this isn't about them so don't change the subject.

2.I'd really rather you didn't use my existence as a means to oppress, subjugate, punish, eviscerate, and/or, you know, be mean to others. I don't require sacrifices, and purity is for drinking water, not people.

3.I'd really rather you didn't judge people for the way they look, or how they dress, or the way they talk, or, well, just play nice, Okay?...
continue reading...
I ask this question because I was rereading Plato's Euthyphro today and was reminded of the homosexual argument. For those of you unfamiliar with the dialogue, let me summarize here. For the full dialogue, please link.

In the dialogue, Socrates points out plenty of flaws in Euthyphro's reasoning of what piety is. I highly recommend it, especially for logicians. The argument can be summed up as this (and I'm paraphrasing).

Socrates: What is piety?
Euthyphro: Doing as I am doing (Prosecuting my father for murdering someone).
Socrates: Ah, but that's not an answer, it is an example of piety. What...
continue reading...
added by kurt-wagner
added by MajorDork74
Source: RightWingStuff.com
added by ThePrincesTale
Source: https://www.reddit.com/user/traesifuentes